Risk Assessment

Risk Taxonomy Development Guide

How to develop and maintain a comprehensive risk taxonomy that enables consistent risk identification and reporting.

guide · Risk Taxonomy · intermediate · Free

By the Risk Atlas editorial team · Last updated

Developing a Risk Taxonomy

What is a Risk Taxonomy?

A risk taxonomy is a structured classification system that organizes risks into categories and subcategories, enabling consistent identification, assessment, and reporting across the organization.

Benefits of a Risk Taxonomy

  • Common language for risk discussions
  • Consistent risk identification
  • Comparable assessments across units
  • Aggregation for portfolio view
  • Regulatory alignment

Design Principles

1. Mutually Exclusive

Each risk belongs to only one category

2. Collectively Exhaustive

All risks can be classified

3. Appropriate Granularity

  • Too broad: Loss of detail
  • Too granular: Administrative burden

4. Aligned with Business

Reflects how organization thinks about risk

Sample Risk Taxonomy Structure

Level 1: Strategic Risks

  • Business model risk
  • Competitive risk
  • Reputation risk
  • Strategic execution risk

Level 1: Financial Risks

  • Credit risk (counterparty, concentration)
  • Market risk (interest rate, FX, equity)
  • Liquidity risk (funding, market liquidity)
  • Investment risk

Level 1: Operational Risks

  • Process risk
  • People risk
  • Technology risk
  • External event risk

Level 1: Compliance Risks

  • Regulatory risk
  • Legal risk
  • Conduct risk
  • Financial crime risk

Level 1: Technology Risks

  • Cyber security risk
  • Data risk
  • Infrastructure risk
  • Third-party technology risk

Development Process

Step 1: Research

  • Industry standards (Basel, Solvency II)
  • Peer organizations
  • Historical incidents

Step 2: Draft Structure

  • Top-down from strategic objectives
  • Bottom-up from known risks
  • Typically 4-6 Level 1 categories

Step 3: Stakeholder Input

  • Business unit validation
  • Risk function review
  • Executive approval

Step 4: Implementation

  • Training and communication
  • System configuration
  • Mapping existing risks

Step 5: Maintenance

  • Annual review
  • Emerging risk updates
  • Post-incident adjustments

Integration with Risk Register

  • Each risk tagged to taxonomy
  • Enables aggregation and reporting
  • Supports risk appetite alignment

Tags: taxonomy, classification, risk categories, organization

More in Risk Assessment

Back to all resources · Look up a term